Retirement Bridge Number: Calculate Your Annual Funding Gaps

Calculate one gap per year

Synthetic example: work ends at 62 and additional benefits start at 67. All figures are annual 2026 dollars. Spending includes healthcare but excludes income tax; income is gross and excludes portfolio withdrawals. The income-tax allowance is counted once.

Compare need with assets available at the right time

Assume $80,000 cash plus $240,000 taxable investments available for the bridge: $320,000 versus $288,000 of positive gaps leaves $32,000 before returns and additional shocks. Exclude $700,000 of home equity unless a specific sale/borrowing plan provides cash. A restricted retirement account is not accessible merely because it appears in net worth.

Adding $5,000 annual spending for all five years raises need by $25,000 to $313,000, leaving $7,000. The age-65 reduction in this example is a healthcare cost change, not a Medicare income payment. Then use bridge funding strategy and account-access rules to test the sources.

Try your own annual bridge worksheet

Change the example without opening or overwriting a saved plan. Positive annual gaps are added together; years with surplus income do not automatically offset later gaps.

Retirement has a lifetime number and a bridge number

A lifetime projection asks whether all resources can support spending through the planning horizon. The bridge calculation asks a narrower question: can available resources carry the household from retirement to the next dependable-income milestone? A plan can pass the first test on paper and still struggle with the second when most wealth sits in a home or an account that is not yet available under the assumed rules.

Start the bridge at the first retirement date. End it at the milestone that materially changes cash flow—often Social Security, Medicare, a pension, or a partner's later retirement. Couples may need more than one bridge because paychecks and benefits can begin and end on different dates.

Planning takeaway

The bridge is a timing test: it asks whether the right dollars exist in the years they are needed.

Calculate the yearly gap instead of multiplying one expense

For each bridge year, estimate core spending, private health coverage, taxes, debt payments, and planned one-time costs. Subtract wages that continue, consulting income, pension payments, and other dependable cash flow. What remains is the annual portfolio job. Add those yearly gaps to form a first bridge estimate.

Do not assume every year is identical. Health costs can change at Medicare eligibility, a mortgage can end, travel can be front-loaded, and Social Security can begin partway through the period. Taxes also depend on which account supplies cash. A year-by-year bridge may therefore be meaningfully different from annual spending multiplied by five.

• SpendingSeparate core costs, flexible lifestyle spending, health coverage, and dated goals.
• IncomePlace each paycheck, pension, and benefit in the year it actually starts or stops.
• TaxesEstimate the tax effect of the funding source rather than adding one flat percentage.

Compare the need with accessible assets

Cash and taxable brokerage assets are usually easier to place in the accessible column, although selling investments can realize gains and expose the plan to market timing. Retirement accounts require more care. Plan rules, age, separation date, distribution type, and Roth ordering rules can all affect whether a withdrawal is available and how it is taxed or penalized.

Home equity should not silently count as bridge cash. Include it only when the scenario specifies a realistic action such as selling, downsizing, or borrowing, along with timing and costs. Likewise, an optional loan should appear as proceeds in a stated year and as future principal-and-interest payments—not as free assets.

Planning takeaway

Use an explicit access age for each account and make borrowing a visible scenario, not a hidden assumption.

Stress the bridge before optimizing the lifetime plan

A bridge funded from volatile assets is sensitive to poor returns early in retirement. Test an early market decline, higher health premiums, and one large expense. Then define a response: hold more near-term reserves, delay retirement, earn limited income, adjust flexible spending, change a claiming date, or test borrowing with its full repayment cost.

After the bridge works, return to the lifetime model. A large accessible cushion can solve the early years but still create later risk if dependable income is too low. Conversely, a tight bridge may lead into a strong later phase. Both numbers belong in the decision, and neither is a promise.